News

News

PublISHED ON

UpDATED ON

Open access to research data is possible given the right conditions

Each year, the Swedish Research Council publishes a mapping, an analysis and an assessment of how the national work on open access to research data is developing. This year’s report shows that additional resources are needed to speed up the development.

Five indicators have been developed to enable tracking changes over time for the actors affected by the transition to open access to research data. The indicators cover different areas, such as strategy and policy, working practices, procedures and processes, and knowledge-enhancing initiatives. Together, they provide a picture of the scope of the impact of the work on open access to research data, and the type of support different actors will need in the future. The indicators are based on other frameworks, such as FAIR and the agreement that forms the basis for CoARA (Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment).

This year’s report shows that additional resources are needed to enable necessary changes. The result is expected, as the transition to open access to research data requires new ways of working, structures, competences and technical conditions, which all take time. Many organisations are also managing the transition to an open science system within several areas simultaneously, where research data form an important part.

“The annual report is an important foundation for the continued work, as it provides a picture of what needs to be done for Sweden to achieve the goal of open access to research data,” says Katarina Bjelke, Director General of the Swedish Research Council.

During Sweden’s presidency of the European Council, a declaration was presented about maximising the advantages of research data. The ‘Lund Declaration’ underlines that research data that are FAIR and open from the start can increase the quality, effectiveness, transparency and integrity of research and innovation.

“The Lund Declaration shows that there is strong political support for the work on open access to research data. We look forward to continue working with actors, both national and international, within this major and important area,” says Katarine Bjelke.

Öppen tillgång till forskningsdata – en kartläggning, analys och bedömning 2023 (in Swedish with English summary)

The Lund Declaration on the Government’s website (in Swedish). External link.

The Swedish Research Council’s indicators in brief

  1. There is a strategic focus for open access to research data that is based on good data management and where access is created according to the principle of “as open as possible and as limited as necessary”.
  2. Organisational working practices, procedures and processes include work on open access to research data.
  3. Knowledge-enhancing initiatives for open access to research data have been established.
  4. Research data are produced based on good data management and are made openly accessible according to the principle of “as open as possible and as limited as necessary”.
  5. Open access to research data is part of the incentive system.

Each claim (indicator) is evaluated on a three-grade scale: “Fulfilled”, “Partly fulfilled” or “Not fulfilled”.

The indicators in their entirety (in Swedish)

PUBLISHED ON

UpDATED ON

MORE WITHIN THE SAME SUBJECT AREA

  1. Agreements completed with four publishers of open access journals

    Last autumn, the Swedish Research Council, Formas, Forte, and Vinnova made a focus decision to fund publishing using publishers that only produce journals with full open access. Agreements have now been entered into with four publishers.

  2. Open access to scientific publications

    The Swedish Research Council is driving the development towards open access to scientific publications together with other research funding bodies within and outside Sweden. One of the ways we do this is to establish guidelines for publication with o...

  3. Indicators for measuring and following up

    The Swedish Research Council has produced indicators that can be used to follow up and measure the effects of the work on the transition to open access to research data. They can also be used to identify areas where extra efforts are needed.